The manner in which different cities attempt to address homelessness within their boundaries varies significantly. At one end of the spectrum, there are cities that are more open to offering services and developing resources designed to address issues surrounding homelessness within their borders. On the other hand, there are cities that employ aggressive and even controversial strategies to get homeless people out of their communities. There are a number of controversial ways in which certain sites have tried to get rid of homeless people.

Ordinances That “Criminalize” Homelessness

One set of strategies that are used by some cities when it comes to their attempts to drive out homeless people is what oftentimes is called “criminalizing homelessness.” Criminalizing homelessness really means the enactment of city ordinances that make it difficult for homeless people to stay in a community. Examples of these ordinances include:

  • No camping
  • No loitering
  • No panhandling
  • Time limitations on being in a certain area
  • Closing parks and green spaces at night

Some cities have even taken the step to make it illegal to give food to a homeless person. This prohibition exists even in situations in which a homeless person is not panhandling.

These types of ordinances generally do not have a significant impact on people in a community who have places to live. However, these types of ordinances have a profound impact on homeless people. When enacted together, ordinances establishing these limitations can render a community inhospitable to a homeless person.

Criminalizing homelessness through these types of ordinances has become one of the most controversial strategies employed by municipalities to drive out the homeless population.

Greyhound Therapy

Another controversial strategy used in some communities has been given the “blanket name” of Greyhound Therapy. Greyhound Therapy originated from a practice in the healthcare industry to put troublesome or challenging patients on a bus and send them elsewhere. This strategy expanded in more recent times to include buying homeless people one-way bus tickets out of town.

In this day and age, Greyhound Therapy has been extended to encompass cities that purchase tickets for passage on regional trains. For example, in California, there is evidence to suggest that some communities have arranged for homeless people to receive one-way rail tickets on Amtrak and even on Metrolink.

Homeless Sweeps

Even in cities that lack certain ordinances regulating where and how homeless people can congregate, another controversial strategy used in some cities to eliminate homeless people from communities are law enforcement sweeps. Law enforcement sweeps work in one of two ways.

First, through the law enforcement sweep process, homeless people are repeatedly forced to move from one location to another. Sweeps can be with such regularity that homeless people find it highly challenging to get a bit of rest, let alone a night’s sleep.

Second, a good percentage of homeless people find themselves with outstanding warrants. These warrants oftentimes are for minor infractions. There are instances in which parents of homeless families have warrants. In communities that utilize law enforcement sweeps aggressively, homeless people in this type of situation cannot risk getting arrested when they have children. Thus, they are highly likely to migrate to a community that does not aggressively utilize sweeps in regard to the homeless population.

Cities With the Most Controversial Strategies to Get Rid of Homeless People

The Coalition for the Homeless has developed a list of the top 20 cities in the United States that have the most controversial programs to eliminate homeless people from their communities. The Coalition actually refers to these as the “meanest” cities when it comes to dealing with their homeless populations. These cities are:

  1. Sarasota, Florida
  2. Lawrence, Kansas
  3. Little Rock, Arkansas
  4. Atlanta, Georgia
  5. Las Vegas, Nevada
  6. Dallas, Texas
  7. Houston, Texas
  8. San Juan, Puerto Rico **
  9. Santa Monica, California
  10. Flagstaff, Arizona
  11. San Francisco, California
  12. Chicago, Illinois
  13. San Antonio, Texas
  14. New York City, New York
  15. Austin, Texas
  16. Anchorage, Alaska
  17. Phoenix, Arizona
  18. Los Angeles, California
  19. St. Louis, Missouri
  20. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

** San Juan, Puerto Rico: Following Hurricane Maria in 2017, the aggressive tactics used in San Juan to get rid of homeless people ground to a halt.

Legal Challenges to Strategies to Remove Homeless From Cities

Organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union have become highly active in legally challenging cities that utilize some of the strategies mentioned in this article. These organizations have enjoyed fairly regular success in bringing cities to the bargaining table to reach accommodations that prevent forcing homeless individuals and families from the community.


Emily Kil

Co-Owner of Eco Bear Biohazard Cleaning Company

Together with her husband, Emily Kil is co-owner of Eco Bear, a leading biohazard remediation company in Southern California. An experienced entrepreneur, Emily assisted in founding Eco Bear as a means of combining her business experience with her desire to provide assistance to people facing challenging circumstances. Emily regularly writes about her first-hand experiences providing services like biohazard cleanup, suicide cleanup, crime scene cleanup, unattended death cleanup, and other types of difficult remediations in homes and businesses.